Player Evaluation and Team Formation Process
Introduction
This document outlines the principles and procedures used during annual player evaluations and team formation. The primary goal of evaluations is to fairly and consistently assess athletes and place them on teams with players of similar ability. The evaluation process also assists FMRA in creating competitively balanced teams when multiple teams exist within the same division.
Evaluations will ideally begin during the second week of September, with the goal of forming teams as early as possible. Athletes are encouraged to attend evaluations physically prepared and ready to participate.
Athletes at the U10-U14 level will participate in:
Athletes at the U16/U19 level will participate in:
Team rosters will be released once all evaluations have been completed and evaluation data have been reviewed and analyzed.
Athletes are expected to attend all scheduled evaluation sessions, as absences may significantly impact team placement. If an athlete is unable to attend, a written explanation from the athlete and/or parent must be submitted to the Technical Director before the evaluation sessions begin. The Evaluation Committee will review each circumstance individually and determine the most appropriate placement. Previous-season coach feedback may be considered when necessary.
This document will be reviewed annually and updated as needed as part of FMRA's commitment to continuous improvement.
Roles and Responsibilities
Evaluation Committee
The Evaluation Committee is responsible for reviewing evaluation results and determining final player placement and team formation.
Committee Membership
UAA Evaluators
UAA Evaluators are responsible for:
Gameplay Evaluators (including shooting and passing)
Gameplay Evaluators are responsible for assessing athletes during scrimmages.
Evaluators will ideally be former ringette players with significant experience and/or coaches and parents with multiple years of ringette experience.
Evaluators will:
To avoid conflict of interest:
If association members are required due to evaluator shortages:
All gameplay evaluators will submit raw data to the Technical Director.
Player Evaluation Process
Universal Athlete Assessment (UAA)
Developed by Ringette Alberta, the UAA consists of objective, repeatable, timed skill assessments. All U10, U12, and U14 athletes must participate in a UAA session.
Players and parents are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the drills through Ringette Alberta’s instructional videos. For more information, visit: Ringette Alberta: Website by RAMP InterActive
The UAA assessment team will consist of association volunteers. If a volunteer's child is participating in a station, that volunteer must switch stations with another volunteer to avoid conflicts of interest.
UAA Drills U10-U14
Each drill is designed to objectively measure skating and ring-handling skills specific to ringette.
No U10 or U12 athlete may declare as a goaltender. Athletes at U14 may declare themselves as a full-time goaltender, which may exempt those athletes from the UAA components.
Shooting and Passing Criteria
All U10, U12, and U14 athletes must participate in the shooting and passing evaluations, which will be done with the gameplay evaluations as their warm-up.
Gameplay Evaluation Criteria
All U10 - U19 athletes will participate in Gameplay evaluations. Players will be scored from 1-4 in each of the following categories. Scores are assigned relative to other athletes within the same division:
Gameplay sessions should not exceed 30 skaters to ensure adequate observation opportunities.
Approximately every 90 seconds:
Player groupings will be adjusted periodically to ensure athletes play with a variety of teammates.
All U10, U12, and U14 players will rotate through Centre, Forward, and Defense.
All U16 and U19 players may remain in their preferred position throughout evaluations, provided positional balance exists across teams.
Evaluation scores will be compiled by the Technical Director and independently reviewed for accuracy.
General Information
U10 Division
The U10 Division is considered Children’s Ringette by Ringette Alberta and is divided into steps. They are:
The U10 division is not a tiered division. The “steps” within the U10 division have been created so that athletes of varying skill, experience, and readiness can be successful. It recognizes the importance of the athlete, not just an athlete’s chronological age or skill set. This holistic approach is optimal for long-term athlete development.
Five considerations when grouping players are:
A tiered program would only look at an athlete’s ringette skills. The Active Start/Step model recognizes that children do not develop on the same linear curve, nor do they develop on one curve in all four areas. Every child is an individual and therefore will not necessarily progress from one step to the next in a linear fashion.
Children who are seven years old and under and have never played ringette before register in Active Start. For Active Start, there is no formal evaluation process.
For U10 Steps 1 through 3, the evaluation weighting:
Potential team levels may include:
Following the completion of evaluations, Head Coaches will be given a formed team for their season. Players will be placed based on their overall evaluation results.
U12 Division
The U12 division is still considered Children’s Ringette by Ringette Alberta. This will be an athlete's first experience of playing within tiered divisions. To determine player placement, a consistent evaluation process will be utilized to allow for an impartial assessment of a player’s total ringette skillset.
Evaluation Weighting:
Potential team tiers may include:
Players will be placed based on their overall evaluation results.
If there is more than one team in a tier, balanced teams will be the primary goal. The ranked list of players will go through a snake draft to determine the teams. Final teams within the same tier should have comparable cumulative team scores.
| Team 1 | Team 2 |
| 1 (Stronger goalie) | 2 |
| 4 | 3 |
| 6 | 5 |
| 8 and so on… | 7 |
Where it has been determined that there will be a higher-level team, the following team selection process shall be used. 70% of the team roster will be filled by the top-ranked athletes as per the player evaluation. For example, if a team is of 11 players, the top 8 players in the evaluation ranking will be placed on the higher team. The remainder of the higher-level team’s roster will be chosen from the remaining players by the Evaluation Committee; however, unless there are extenuating circumstances, there should be no players selected from the bottom 40% of evaluations.
U14 Division
Evaluation Weighting:
Potential team tiers may include:
Players will be placed based on their overall evaluation results.
If there is more than one team in a tier, balanced teams will be the primary goal. The ranked list of players will go through a snake draft to determine the teams. Final teams within the same tier should have comparable cumulative team scores.
| Team 1 | Team 2 |
| 1 (Stronger goalie) | 2 |
| 4 | 3 |
| 6 | 5 |
| 8 and so on… | 7 |
Where it has been determined that there will be a higher-level team, the following team selection process shall be used. 70% of the team roster will be filled by the top-ranked athletes as per the player evaluation. For example, if a team is of 11 players, the top 8 players in the evaluation ranking will be placed on the higher team. The remainder of the higher-level team’s roster will be chosen from the remaining players by the Evaluation Committee; however, unless there are extenuating circumstances, there should be no players selected from the bottom 40% of evaluations
U16/U19 Division
Player placement will follow Ringette Alberta tiering policies.
Evaluation Weighting:
Potential team tiers may include:
If there is more than one team in a tier, balanced teams will be the primary goal. The ranked list of players will go through a snake draft to determine the teams. Final teams within the same tier should have comparable cumulative team scores.
| Team 1 | Team 2 |
| 1 (Stronger goalie) | 2 |
| 4 | 3 |
| 6 | 5 |
| 8 and so on… | 7 |
Where it has been determined that there will be a higher-level team, the following team selection process shall be used. 70% of the team roster will be filled by the top-ranked athletes as per the player evaluation. For example, if a team is of 11 players, the top 8 players in the evaluation ranking will be placed on the higher team. The remainder of the higher-level team’s roster will be chosen from the remaining players by the Evaluation Committee; however, unless there are extenuating circumstances, there should be no players selected from the bottom 40% of evaluations
Team Tier Determination
For U10, U12, and U14 divisions:
For U16 and U19 divisions:
Roster sizes will depend on registration numbers within each division but will not be more than 18 players per team.
Goalie Evaluations
U10 goalies will not be formally evaluated. The U10 program encourages all interested athletes to try the goalie position throughout the season.
U12 and above Goalies will be evaluated separately by designated goaltending evaluators.
Evaluation categories include:
The number of goalies assigned to each team will be determined by the Evaluation Committee.
Dispute Resolution
Parents or players of age may submit a written dispute regarding team placement.
Disputes must be submitted within 48 hours of roster release and should clearly identify the concern and the basis for the review request. The Evaluation Committee will review all submissions and provide a written response.
To maintain the integrity of the evaluation process and protect evaluator confidentiality, individual gameplay evaluation scores and evaluator comments will not be released. Gameplay evaluations are based on multiple independent observations and comparative assessments within a player's division and are intended solely for team placement purposes.
Final Universal Athlete Assessment (UAA) results may be requested by a parent or player of age for an administrative fee of $50. This fee is intended to offset the administrative time required to retrieve, review, and prepare the evaluation records for release.
Contacts
Technical Director
technicaldirector@fortmcmurrayringette.com
Sean Peterson
President
president@fortmcmurrayringette.com
Trinidy Wiesner
Vice President
vicepresident@fortmcmurrayringette.com
Rachel Ridenour